Bloodbath in Hedgistan Leads to Lawsuits Against Regulators

StockJockey's avatar
by StockJockey
Monday, September 22, 2008 - 12:18 am

Changing the rules in the middle of the game usually leads to at least one unhappy party, and while the regulators won round one against hedge funds, the funds that are still standing are counterpunching via a lawsuit to be filed imminently:

A group of the world's biggest hedge funds are planning to sue the Financial Services Authority for millions of pounds of losses incurred as a result of the regulator's ban on short-selling last week.

Lawyers are being galvanised on behalf of a raft of hedge funds which claim the financial watchdog has illegitimately extended its powers and caused "wide-spread capital destruction."
Telegraph

Unfortunately, legitimate risk management strategies have been harmed, something regulators failed to take into account before taking action:

"Short-selling is used for a raft of reasons, not just betting on stocks going down. Sure, there are some evil market manipulators, but this ban has trashed legitimate businesses from options trading, convertible funds and a range of risk management strategies."

But last week's extraordinary trading claimed many high profile victims, many of which were limping coming into the week. Prominent funds are down 50% YTD...will they survive?

The most recent figures from HSBC private bank showed that some hedge funds are nursing losses of as much as 50 per cent this year, with many funds having dropped more than 10 per cent last week alone. Insiders said some of the best-known funds, including Och-Ziff, Atticus, RAB Capital and Tosca are nursing heavy losses.

Throw historical precedents out the window, this market has broken all the old rules. It is about finding blood in the water and shooting against weak holders.

Tim Steer of New Star said: “What matters now is not what company you own but who owns that company. Valuations have gone out of the window. Now you have to look at the shareholder register and work out who’s going to be forced to sell. If it’s a long-only blue chip stock, that’s OK, if it’s owned by hedge funds, then watch out.”

Until some semblance of normality returns many people will choose to sit it out. From Mayfair to Midtown life has changed, and life on the BuySide will likely never be the same.

Hedge funds plan to sue FSA over short-selling ban
Telegraph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The content contained represent the opinions of 1440 Wall Street. This commentary in no way constitutes a solicitation of business or investment advice. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. No position

Comments:

I knew, I’ll be in touch with my attorney in the morning.  In the words of the immortal Philip Goldstein:

“These mother fuckers are not going to get away with this”

Posted by  on  09/22/2008  at  12:58 AM

Whaaaat, don’t sue the market manipulators, adapt and profit from all the BS! These hedge funds should invest in my PennyStocking DVD rather than pay lawyers!

Posted by Timothy Sykes  on  09/22/2008  at  01:48 AM

I always wonder who’s on the other side of my trades, especially when there’s a squeeze. I mean, didn’t everybody grab Wachovia on the breakout at 10? 

Mr. Sykes idea is a good one. These hedge funds should consider another asset class or another line of work entirely. Maybe some of them can get their old jobs back as retail stockbrokers since running money obviously isn’t their forte. I hear Merrill Lynch is hiring.

Posted by  on  09/22/2008  at  08:17 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main

Search


Advanced Search

Follow StockJockey on Twitter