Lehman Brothers: Facts vs. Fiction

StockJockey's avatar
by StockJockey
Wednesday, June 04, 2008 - 8:39 pm

With the dust settling on another day on Wall Street, it appears the venerable house of Lehman Brothers (LEH-NYSE) is still standing.

But the spin, and damage control, continues. And unfortunately, due to the complexity of analyzing the balance sheet of a financial entity, as opposed to a garden variety industrial company, facts are getting twisted. But first things first.

Although Erin Callan is everyone's favorite pinup girl, Lehman is still very much Dick Fuld's firm. He thrives on days like this, although one could argue his missteps have led us here. But if David Einhorn represents the youth movement on the Street, Fuld is old-school, and the dinosaurs on the Street on rallying around him:

``Lehman will survive,'' said George Ball, the former CEO of Prudential Bache Securities who now oversees Houston-based brokerage Sanders Morris Harris Bloomberg

While many investors this week worried Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc was in trouble, Lazard Ltd Chief Executive Bruce Wasserstein trusts Lehman CEO Richard Fuld to get the embattled investment bank through the current market crisis.

"Dick Fuld is very able," Wasserstein told Reuters before speaking at a Wall Street Journal breakfast panel.
Reuters

Able indeed; Fuld led the evacuation of Lehman's headquarters on September 11th, and chances are he can deal with an hedge fund manager who is not comparing apples to apples, at least when it comes to Lehman's leverage ratios. Just how levered is Lehman, exactly?


How hard will Dick Fuld spank Einhorn?

Mr Einhorn, who stressed that his fund was not primarily a short-seller, said: “The problem is the overall leverage and loan portfolio . . . they are 40 times levered on tangible equity, and they own things that don’t strike me as being the kinds of things that should be levered at all.”

Mr Einhorn’s leverage figure is higher than that calculated by Lehman and other Wall Street analysts. FT

Using Einhorn’s tangible equity approach results in the highest leverage ratios being bandied about. But his numbers don’t jibe with these, reported by the NYT:

Lehman, like its counterparts, is racing to use less leverage. The bank had a gross leverage ratio of 31.7:1 at the end of the first quarter, meaning it had borrowed $31.70 for each dollar of equity. Lehman has whittled that ratio down to 25:1 through its more than $100 billion in asset sales, said the person close to the company who was given anonymity because he was discussing a pending financial filing. NYT

But a mid-day release by Lehman attempted to clarify the issue, although the stock probably did not respond as they had hoped:

Lehman is expected to report second-quarter net leverage ratio of about 12.5 times versus 15.4 times in the first quarter, the source said. Its gross leverage is expected to be about 24.5 times versus 31.7 times in the first quarter, the source said.

Gross leverage ratio is total assets divided by total stockholders’ equity, while net leverage ratio is net assets divided by tangible equity capital. Reuters

Clearly Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn was parroting the worst case numbers for the firm, but it has been an Apples to Oranges comparison.

Einhorn’s argument and campaign have taken on near religious overtones, he calls Lehman one of the last of Wall Street’s “deniers”; his crusade is not likely to end any time soon.

But many myths have been spread on the internet, some irresponsible, others just wrong. The share buyback was much ado about nothing, only 1.3 million shares according to one report. And if compare Lehman against its peers, it might be the only broker than can actually swing a buyback at this time. Sorry, Goldman, but you had better hoard that capital.

I have gotten some of it wrong, apparently regulators have not been pressing Lehman to raise capital, although most of the analysts covering them would like to see them do so.

Einhorn has been claiming they need to raise in the neighborhood of $75 billion, but an overnight deal to raise $4 billion in equity and an equal amount in convertible debt would do the trick, and put this in the rear view mirror.

Will it happen? Perhaps, many suitors are kicking the tires, and pricing the stock down a couple dollars from the close could put an end to all the nonsense.

Of course, if the regulators are not pressing Lehman to raise money, as has been widely assumed, Goldman and other brokers might not need to either.

But Lehman does have its backers outside of the dinosaurs supporting Fuld, many of whom believe Einhorn is exaggerating his case. David Trone of SellSide boutique Fox-Pitt Kelton hosted a conference call Wednesday for 150 BuySide clients, and is as objective a voice as you will get in this battle. While Lehman might be lugging around more mortgage assets than he would like to see, bankruptcy would seem a remote possibility.

Trone goes so far as to call Einhorn’s short thesis “flimsy”, and doubts Einhorn has the accounting background demanded of financial sector specialists, whose skill sets are unique in the realm of the analyst world.

And I have to ask why nobody has factored Lehman’s asset management operation, Neuberger Berman, into the mix? The subsidiary is worth billions, but I have never seen it mentioned in the debate. It is a crown jewel.

Enjoy the video, but gird yourself, as Einhorn is scheduled to be on CNBC’s Squawk Box bright and early.


_______________________________________________________________

Lehman Battles an Insurgent Investor
NYT

Betting against Lehman at record levels
FT

Lehman to report lower 2nd-quarter leverage ratios: source
Reuters

Lehman Snaps Three-Day Decline as Merrill Says
Bloomberg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of 1440 Wall Street. This commentary in no way constitutes a solicitation of business or investment advice. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. No Position

Comments:

Great read on Lehman ...
They are making strides to keep things above water.
I really feel the damage is already done.
Time will tell.

Posted by Tom DeMattia  on  06/06/2008  at  03:23 PM

The internet bears are congratulating themselves today, but the stock is trading at last weeks levels when the rhetoric heated up.

A flat stock is a win, although you cant eat relative performance.

There was no reason to get long before the capital raise, so now the real battle begins.

I would rather buy LAZ on weakness, around $35, than LEH however.

Sj

Posted by  on  06/09/2008  at  12:08 PM

Hey Tom and Stockjock.  How do you feel about LEH today ($25)?  MER downgrades just days after their upgrade last week.  Would you really take the advice of David Trone of Fox-Pitt over David Einhorn?  Do you think Einhorn banked over $100 million last year because he is “inexperienced at looking at financials”?  I laugh at all the naivety all the time when it comes to Wall Street.  Like the guys who show up at a Marriott to become professional traders and “beat the Market” for a $200 seminar.  When will most of you naive pups understand that the top hedge funds are the saviest on Wall Street and that they attract “MAJOR, MAJOR, MAJOR” talent.  Do you really think you are going to beat them?  Obviously if you’re still long LEH at 34 from your last post, you will never.  Why when it comes to finance to people understimate talent?  I bet there are very few over the entire WWW that would think they could beat MJ in a game of one on one.  Stop espousing your disallusioned crap.

Signed,

A very successful professional prop trader of his own securities firm who is still short LEH!

Posted by  on  06/11/2008  at  02:36 PM

Tom,

Congratulations on your trade. Perhaps you should read more than one post on this site. I think I have done a decent job presenting both sides of this argument.

Shorting the stock last week going into the deal they were telegraphing was a no brainer, and then $28 was the new line in the sand.

Both sides were cherry picking numbers that buttressed their case, and apparently Trone even apologized to Einhorn for calling it a “flimsy” case.

As a trader you don’t care about the ratios involved, but certainly you can pick one that suits you.

The cult of the value manager, not Einhorn in particular, is overrated. Bill Miller, Eddie Lampert, Rich Pzena, etc etc. Whitney Tilson is down 25% over the last year in TILFX, and Ackman really misstimed TGT.

They have all fallen hard, Einhorn will hopefully escape a similar fate, but it just goes to show you.

You might want to read the disclaimers at the end of the post, and I have written critically of Lehman, at much higher prices.

And you can’t buy the fins until they are done raising money. Go read the El-Erian post.

I am glad you are making money, but you seem to be a bit emotional. It could be your achilles heel, you might want get it under control, like a real pro.

good trading,

SJ

Posted by  on  06/11/2008  at  02:57 PM

Who said I was long ??
......
I am a futures trader where the real juice is.

Posted by Tom DeMattia  on  06/11/2008  at  03:08 PM

SJ,

Touche in your assessment of my emotion.  It has on occasion been an Achilles heel.  But I’m sure most if not all successful traders would say they are emotional, particularly when you are in the midst of trading.  I guess the hunger to win versus the fear of losing I constantly battle makes me who I am.  Fourteen years and running my own prop firm as a one man show and still going.  I apologize if I was a bit heavy-handed with my words.  They weren’t intended specifically at you but more generally to the public who constantly amaze me when it comes to their investment naivety.  People really do spend much more time researching a new Hi-Def flat panel or a new auto versus when they decide to throw their hard earned coin at an investment.  I guess it’s the allure of the quick buck, just like Vegas.  Good luck to you in your trading as well SJ.

Gmof

Posted by  on  06/11/2008  at  03:14 PM

No worries guys, appreciate the banter.

It is a remarkable day and emotions are running high.

I have no love lost for Lehman, their institutional sales people screwed me several times.

My point with this post was more to point out how the ratios can be twisted around to suit your point, and you can even find some that make Goldman look worse than Lehman.

And that is something I have been waiting to unfold, Gasparino caught grief over Lehman but Faber was defending Goldman around 10AM today.

Will the stock crack and trade down to $140ish?

BTW you guys should consider joining twitter. There are some good things going on there, and more frequent commments on ths situation, like this post yesterday from me

I am heading to beach the minute $LEH breeches $28, somebody pls lean on that pig 09:30 AM June 10, 2008

thanks for reading guys! BTW i know a guy that wants to join a prop shop, put down 100k deposit, and go 20 to 1 intraday, carry some overnights. If you can help send me email. He works at a hedge fund right now, is very good.

SJ

Posted by  on  06/11/2008  at  03:32 PM

I think this proves my earlier point.  Asset classes (in this case LEH)can move far beyond what the general consesus thinks is possible and is where the big $ is made.  Another eg: FRE and FNM today.  I think this also proves that one should side with someone with the talent of Einhorn than a buy or sell side analyst and that most people underestimate the talent and thorough anlaysis of the top traders in the world.

Posted by  on  07/10/2008  at  02:34 PM

Well, as a long time buysider, you are preaching to the choir.

Both sides had their axes to grind, although i think Einhorn spoke with conviction, yes money was involved but he did believe passionately.

Most of the flip flops on the sell side are the result of buysiders convincing them of the errors of their way, trone never caved though. stubborn?

nothing is good until this recapitalization ends, it is remarkable how long the XLF held above $24. This has played out in slo-mo over the past year.

I dont have a problem with Einhorn per se, but the implosion in the value crowd proves one of my points...these guys are not infallible. Einhorn’s number ok considering he is long biased, but the Value Gurus are a disaster.

Got anything to say about BLK? just curious…

Posted by  on  07/10/2008  at  03:12 PM

I won’t labor my point, you can re-read the blog.  End of Story!

Posted by  on  09/15/2008  at  10:32 AM

end of story indeed...Einhorn et al finally getting paid on TGT and BGP etc...Tilson has had a big comeback last month or two.

Post mortem might focus on Fuld’s actions....maybe decisive action would not have mattered. I am stunned he did not swing the bat last few weeks..Koreans probably would have lost entire investment had they made it however.

Posted by  on  09/15/2008  at  10:46 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main

Search


Advanced Search